OUGD501 - COP - Facebook/Tumblr Theme



Tumblr Facebook Theme


I recently stumbled across this cool Facebook Theme for Tumblr which would be an easy and effective way of making a full functioning online version of the publication. 



I could tae all of my content and break it down into images, videos and text, creating a more interactive experience which feels like your on a version of Facebook. 


Watch This Space. 

View The Theme : HERE in the meantime. 










Lecture 12 - Globalisation, Sustainability & The Media






Market is more powerful in influencing decisions of the globe.
Market expand outside of just a country. desirable idea. share the wealth of the world.


Definitions of Globalisation


Socialist

The process of transformation of local or regional phenomena into global ones. It can be described as a process by which the people of the world are unified into a single society and function together. This process is a combination of economic, technological, sociocultural and political forces.


Capitalist

The elimination of state-enforced restrictions on exchanges across borders and the increasingly integrated and complex global system of production and exchange that has emerged as a result




Markets become more powerful in influencing decisions about the future of the globe rather than governments...


Markets expand outside of countries to ll over the globe.


revolutionaries wanted globalization to happen ... spread capitalism to other countries. They believed that it would mean that everyone has a fair share of the worlds resources.


The recent recession shows that no one can actually control the market we are in.




‘Covering a wide range of distinct political, economic, and cultural trends,
the term “globalization” has quickly become one of the most fashionable
buzzwords of contemporary political and academic debate. In popular
discourse, globalization often functions as little more than a synonym for
one or more of the following phenomena: the pursuit of classical liberal
(or “free market”) policies in the world economy (“economic
liberalization”), the growing dominance of western (or even American)
forms of political, economic, and cultural life (“westernization” or
“Americanization”), the proliferation of new information technologies (the
“Internet Revolution”), as well as the notion that humanity stands at the
threshold of realizing one single unified community in which major
sources of social conflict have vanished (“global integration”)’


Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/globalization/


Because of globalization the world becomes Americanized.
We are all now conntected via communication devices which makes globalization easier.


Mcdonaldization



‘American sociologist George Ritzer coined the
term “McDonaldization” to describe the wide-
ranging sociocultural processes by which the
principles of the fast-food restaurant are coming to
dominate more and more sectors of American
society as well as the rest of the world’


Manfred B. Steger, Globalization: A very Short Introduction, page 71


Brings American principles to other societies...


Marshall McLuhan



Talks about the radio and invention of TV. Technology extends the capabilities of people. You can now see right around the globe. We can experience our effects on every other people in the world...
Experiencing effects of our behaviour in a global scale. 





Should make us more aware of our responsibilities."Globe no bigger than a village."


Nothing is hidden and news is everywhere.

But the problem is it kind of hasn't brought us together and maybe in fact segregated the world and communities even more.




Hatred can be spread from behind a screen without any obvious personal ramifications of your actions.




The Internet 

We live mythically and integrally... In the electric age ,when our central nervous system is technologically extended to involve in the whole of mankind and to incorporate the whole of mankind in us, we necessarily participate... in the consequences of our every action. (1964: p.4)
‘Electric technology... would seem to render individualism obsolete and... corporate interdependence mandatory’ (1962: p.1)


Through economic means and through land grabbing and war capitalism swallows up the rest of the world..


Because the market is expanding globally and they are multinational they are unaccounted for by any government. Starbucks is an example of this as they said they are 'based' in another country so don't need to pay taxes.


‘Does globalization make people around the world
more alike or more different? … A group of
commentators we might call “pessimistic
hyperglobalizers” argue in favour of the former.
They suggest that we are not moving towards a
cultural rainbow that reflects the diversity of the
world’s existing cultures. Rather, we are
witnessing the rise of an increasingly homogenized
popular culture underwritten by a Western “culture
industry” based in New York, Hollywood, London
and Milan’


Manfred B. Steger, Globalization: A very Short Introduction, page 70


Cultural Imperialism


If the 'global village' is run with a certain set of values then it would not be so much an integrated community as an assimilated one.
Key thinkers-
Schiller
Chomsky


Another form of imperialism - creating an empire. Taking over empires and controlling them.


In the modern era imperialism is not for traditional means but actually for changing the way people think so the become more like your own culture... Western America culture mind set spreading over the world.



Time Warner


All the subsidiaries that Time Warner owns.
Most multi media companies come from North America.
Theyre being constantly bombarded with Western ideas, it is natural that it will begin to change the people in the rest of the world.
US media power thought of as a new form of imperialism.








An American way of thinking and American ideas of consuming things.









Big Brother has spread from western culture to the rest of the world.
You create a product in the rest, re-package it and send it round the rest of the world.









Murdoch controls a third of the market. He boasts that whoever the Sun says the people should vote for will win the election. Murdoch is explicit about having the power to control the way people thinks.

You can only report what you are aloud to report. If you accuse Barack Obama of war crimes you would have to be very nice to him otherwise you would never get an interview with him again. Covering things up like this. 









US-based Global Climate Coalition (GCC)

comprising fossil fuel and automobile companies such as Exxon, Texaco and Ford. The GCC was started up by Burson-Marsteller, one of the world's largest public relations companies, to rubbish the credibility of climate scientists and 'scare stories' about global warming.
flak is characterized by concerted and intentional efforts to manage public information.


This company brought out loads of positive stories to make their companies look like they are not harming the planet.



Inconvenient truth


Release less CO2
Plant more vegetation
Try to be CO2 neutral
Recycle
Buy a hybrid vehicle
Encourage everyone you know to watch


Flat Earthers
Jim Inhofe ‘Global warming is one of the biggest hoaxes ever perpetuated on the American public.’

Nigel Lawson ‘It is a propagandist’s term. It trips off the tongue nicely’
Competitive Enterprise Institute







Erin Balser, 'Capital Accumulation, Sustainability and Hamilton, Ontario: How Technology and Capitalism can Misappropriate the Idea of Sustainability'



BIOX Biofuel plant, Canada
Alternative ‘clean’ fuel
Renewable
More expensive to produce

It is more expensive to produce bio fuel plant in Canada so people are not prepared to buy it. When they built the new factory to make bio-fuel they built it in the cheapest part of Ontario, causing a lot of noise pollution.











Shepheard Fairy work in the sun newspaper


He tried using his work to try and spread the need of sustainability to a much wider audience..
















OUGD501 - COP - Social Media Users Research

2Source : http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Technology-and-social-networks/Part-2/Facebook-activities.aspx


Research into Social Network Services, Facts Figures and Statistics 



Social network services (SNS) have a number of common features. These include the ability of users to create a list of “friends,” update their “status,” to comment on other users’ statuses and content, to indicate that they like another user’s content, and to send private messages. We asked survey participants to report on the frequency at which they perform these various activities on Facebook.
On an average day:
  • 15% of Facebook users update their own status.
  • 22% comment on another’s post or status.
  • 20% comment on another user’s photos.
  • 26% “Like” another user’s content.
  • 10% send another user a private message
Most people update their status less than once per week.
The act of contributing a status update is an infrequent activity for most users. A majority of Facebook users (56%) update their status less than once per week. Only 15% of Facebook users update their status at least once per day. Nearly one in six (16%) have never updated their status.

Women and the young drive Facebook usage.

Some 18% of women update their Facebook status at least once per day. Only 11% of men do the same. At the same time, Facebook users over the age of 35 are the least likely to have ever updated their Facebook profile or to update their status more than 1-2 days per week.
Frequency of Facebook status updates by age
Frequency of Facebook status updates by sex

Facebook users are more likely to comment on another user’s status than to update their own status.

Despite the relative infrequency at which most users update their own status, most Facebook users comment on other users’ statuses at least 1-2 days per week (53%). More than one in five Facebook users (22%) comment on another user’s post at least once per day. Younger Facebook users are most likely to comment at least once per day; 23% of Facebook users under the age of 36 comment at least once per day. However, while comment frequency declines with age, one in five (18%) Facebook users under the age of 50 still comments at least once per day. Women are much more likely to leave comments on daily basis; 25% of female Facebook users comment on a post at least daily, the same is true of only 17% of male users.
Frequency of commenting on Facebook posts by age
Frequency of commenting on Facebook posts by sex

Half of Facebook users comment on photos at least 1-2 times each week.

Nearly as popular as commenting on another users’ status is the practice of commenting on another users’ photos. Half of all Facebook users (49%) comment on a photo that was contributed by another user at least 1-2 times per week. Some 20% of Facebook users comment on another user’s photo at least once per day. Frequency of commenting on photos declines with age. However, the frequency of comments on photos is still very high amongst older age groups. Some 10% of Facebook users over the age of 50 comment on a photo each day, while 33% of Facebook users over the age of 50 comment on a photo at least 1-2 times per week. Women are much more likely to comment on photos than are men. 19% of men have never commented on a photo, while only 13% of women have never commented on a photo. Only 13% of men comment on photos on a daily basis, whereas 25% of female Facebook users comment on a photo at least once per day.
Frequency of commenting on Facebook photos by age
Frequency of commenting on Facebook photos by sex

Facebook users like to “like” each other.

In addition to the option of commenting on status updates and content contributed by other users, Facebook users also have the option of clicking on a button to indicate that they “Like” another user’s content or status. This activity was more popular than any other Facebook activity we measured.
  • 26% of all Facebook users indicate that they “Like” content contributed by another Facebook user at least once per day.
  • 44% of Facebook users who are 18-22 years old “Like” their friends’ content on a daily basis. While declining with age, a full 12% of Facebook users over the age of 50 “Like” content at least once per day.
  • Men are much more likely to have never “Liked” any of their friends’ content– 28% of men have never “Liked” something contributed on Facebook compared with only 18% of women.
Frequency of “liking” content on Facebook photos by age
Frequency of “liking” content on Facebook photos by sex

Private messages are infrequently used.

In addition to status updates, commenting, and liking content, Facebook users can also send each other private messages. The majority of Facebook users have sent private messages (82%), but only 37% send at least one message per week. Younger users are modestly more likely to send private messages; 45% of 18-22 year olds send at least one private message per week, compared with 32% of those aged 36-49 and 27% over the age of 50. There is little difference between men and women in their use of Facebook for private messages.
Frequency of sending private messages on Facebook by age
Frequency of sending private messages on Facebook by sex

OUGD501 - Are We All Facebook Stalkers? Research


Are We All Facebook Stalkers?


Posted July 9th, 2012

Facebook seems to tap into a common desire for people to feed their curiosity about others. However, has Facebook really turned all of us into stalkers? And, if everyone is a stalker, does the term stalker still have any meaning?

As a 21-year-old college student, I often hear my friends refer to their online behavior as “Facebook stalking.” When they use this term, they mean a wide array of social networking activities such as looking at other people’s likes, statuses, comments, and, photos. One of my friends defined Facebook stalking as “the use of Facebook for acquiring information that is not obvious, and, if publicly revealed, would make the holder of said information look creepy.” In other words, if you would not be comfortable revealing information about someone, you should not acquire that information in the first place.

While that could be an effective rule of thumb for personal conduct, it’s not one that many people seem to abide by. All of my friends admit to being “Facebook stalkers.” They admit that they have looked at the information of people they don’t know very well (or in some cases don’t know at all) on many occasions. But is anyone to wag a finger at them for this?

While it would usually be creepy to look at the Facebook profile of a complete stranger, what if they have tons of mutual friends and shared interests?

Even when you are “friends” with someone on Facebook, what rights does that afford you in terms of access to their information? There are no right answers, and different people have reached different conclusions on this subject. Yet most people are still nonetheless referring to themselves self-deprecatingly as “Facebook stalkers.”

Are they truly stalkers? If so, this planet contains hundreds of millions of stalkers. Social information technologies have blurred and complicated many of the cultural norms about how people learn about each other.

Think about the connotation of stalking prior to the existence of Facebook.

Stalking once unambiguously referred to a gross violation of individual privacy in which an individual physically tracked a victim in order to collect information and/or impose on the victim the sense that his or her security was in jeopardy. Being a stalker meant expending a considerable amount of time and energy into surveilling and/or harassing someone.

On the other hand, “Facebook stalking” consists of an individual simply sitting in front of a computer screen, clicking a mouse a few times, and effortlessly examining information that a Facebook user has physically placed on the website where other people can see it. While Facebook’s privacy settings are far from perfect, all users basically have the ability to control the level of access other people have to their profiles.

However, one of my roommates pointed out that many Facebook users post to Facebook with the expectation that what they post will only be viewed by their friends. Hence, he believes that when people look at the information of people they do not know well they are breaking from proper Facebook etiquette.


If we have similar tastes in music, film, and literature, that could be an indicator that the two of us will be compatible. On the other hand, if she is a fan of the Westboro Baptist Church or of the group thatinfamously prayed for the death of President Obama, I can erase her number and never think about her again.Others (including this author) have argued that given that people have privacy options on Facebook, it can be acceptable to look at the information of others so long as the information is used in a non-maleficent way. For example, if you get a girl’s number at a party but did not get to know her very well, I would argue that it is ok to check her “likes” to get a sense of whether or not the two of you have anything in common.

Admittedly, by doing what I’ve just described, I would be breaking the Facebook stalking rule described above. I wouldn’t be comfortable telling a girl that I checked out her “likes” and that we like the same bands. However, I see nothing wrong with using Facebook as a vetting process in the manner I’ve just described. I can steer my conversations with her toward film without any reservations and I like to think that that just makes me an effective Facebook user rather than a Facebook stalker.






OUGD501 - Lecture 11 - Censorship & Truth

Overview

  • Notions of censorship and truth
  • The indexical qualities of photography in rendering truth
  • Photographic manipulation and the documentation of truth
  • Censorship in advertising
  • Censorship in art and photography




Ansel Adams - Do you see it as quality photography or something that is cheap
Photographs moons to a great degree.

Negative photographs

The idea of truth - does it delivery truth in terms of the delivery.


 







Same negative but imply different types of light.Some people argue that its pointless and dosent matter. Manipulation goes back to alter things











‘Five years before coming to power in the 1917 October revolution, the Soviets established the newspaper Pravda. For more than seven Decades,until the fall of Communism, Pravda, which Ironically means “truth”, served the Soviet Communist party by censoring and filtering the news presented to Russian and Eastern Europeans’

Aronson, E. and Pratkanis, A., 1992, Age of Propaganda: The Everyday Use and Abuse of Persuasion, New York, Henry Holt & Co., pages 269 - 270

Early forms of image manipulation






manipulation becomes realistic and more creative. 9/11 fake shot


This image mocks advertising students altering it in a very ironic way. This was part of adbusters




This image has been heavily edited to make the girl appear thinner and with a better figure. 







these two are blended together to make it look more dramatic and to make it look like the soldier is threatening the man with the baby. disgusting if you ask me. 









The dury is out on this photograph if you are actually seeing the death of this man.Do we need to know if this is death or is it goo propaganda for showing the faschism is bad ?




‘At that time [World War II], I fervently believed just about everything I was exposed to in school and in the media. For example, I knew that all Germans were evil and that all Japanese were sneaky and treacherous, while all white Americans were clean-cut, honest, fair-minded, and trusting’

Elliot Aronson in Pratkanis and Aronson, (1992), Age of
Propaganda, p. xii

The photo was romanticized in the french magazine Vue ...

‘With lively step, breasting the wind, clenching their rifles, they ran down the slope covered with thick stubble. Suddenly their soaring was interrupted, a bullet whistled - a fratricidal bullet - and their blood was drunk by their native soil’ – caption accompanying the photograph in Vue magazine.

Jean Baudrillard

‘Abstraction today is no longer that of the map, the double, the mirror or the concept. Simulation is no longer that of a territory, a referential being or a substance. It is the generation by models of a real
without origin or relativity: a hyperreal. The territory no longer precedes the map, nor survives it. Henceforth it is the map that precedes the territory – precession of simulacra’

Jean Baudrillard, Simulacra and Simulations, 1981, in Poster, M. (ed.) (1988), Jean Baudrillard: Selected Writings, Cambridge, Polity Press, page 169

‘Whereas representation tries to absorb simulation by interpreting it as false representation, simulation envelops the whole edifice of representation as itself a simulacrum.
These would be the succesive phases of the image:

It is the reflection of a basic reality.
It masks and perverts a basic reality.
It masks the absence of a basic reality.
It bears no relation to any reality whatever : it is its own pure simulacrum.’


Jean Baudrillard, Simulacra and Simulations, 1981, in Poster, M. (ed.) (1988), Jean Baudrillard: Selected Writings, Cambridge, Polity Press, page 173

He here talks about the stages of manipulation. In the end there is nothing true left ...

‘As we approach the likelihood of a new Gulf War, I have an idea and it occurs to me that the Digital Journalist may be the place for it. As we all know, the military pool system created then was meant to be, and was, a major impediment for photojournalists in their quest to communicate the realities of war (This fact does not diminish the great efforts, courage, and many important images created by many of my colleagues who participated in these pools.). Aside from that, while you would have a very difficult time finding an editor of an American publication today that wouldn't condemn this pool system and its restrictions during the Gulf War, most publications and television entities more or less bought the program before the war began (this reality has been far less discussed than the critiques of the pools themselves)’

Peter Turnley, The Unseen Gulf War, December 2002,

In the first world war there was many photo journalists and were governed by the American military. This meant that the government decided which photographs they wanted the public to see..








Real images of war released

This explains the idea that it is a simulation war or a reproduction of a war.
"It is the bellicose equivalent of safe sex: make war like love with a condom! On the Richter scale, the Gulf War would not even reach two or three. "


his appeared on the front of British Newspapers. To be faced with this was very shocking. Regulators deemed this as to gruesome for the front of a newspaper.
Deemed to be to shocking but it was in fact the reality of the war.



Censhorship
The practice or policy of censoring films,letters, or publications


Treffry, D. (ed.) (2001), Paperback English Dictionary, Glasgow: Harper
Collins

Censor
A person authorised to examine films, letters, or publications, in order to ban or cut anything considered obscene or objectionable

To ban or cut portions of (a film, letter or publication)

Treffry, D. (ed.) (2001), Paperback English Dictionary, Glasgow: Harper
Collins

Morals
Principles of behaviour in accordance with
standards of right and wrong

Treffry, D. (ed.) (2001), Paperback English Dictionary, Glasgow: Harper
Collins

Ethics

A code of behaviour, especially of a particular group, profession or individual.
The moral fitness of a decision, course of action etc.
The study of the moral value of human conduct.
Treffry, D. (ed.) (2001), Paperback English Dictionary, Glasgow: Harper
Collins








Flake advert 69


Women in bath with romantic music as she puts a flake into the mouth

‘Suppose that a picture of a young woman inserting a chocolate bar into her mouthmakes one person think of fellatio, but someone else says that this meaning says more about the observer than it does the picture. This kind of dispute, with its assumption that meaning resides in a text quite independently of individual and group preconceptions, is depressingly common in discussions on advertising.










“Decorative models do seem to increase recognition and recall of the advertisement itself. The same probably is true for nudity. Thus , as one article on that technique suggested, ‘While an illustration of a nude female may gain the interest and attention of a viewer, an advertisement depicting a nonsexual scene appears to be more effective in obtaining brand recall”’.

Phillips, M. J. (1997), Ethics and Manipulation in Advertising: Answering a Flawed Indictment, London, Quorum Books, page 121

This image was placed on the side as it was too sexual when left lieng down.
At the tme it was the most complained about image in advertisement history ..
Is it more acceptable when you are tricked to think that it is not as sexual ?













Amy Adler – The Folly of Defining ‘Serious’ Art


Professor of Law at New York University

‘an irreconcilable conflict between legal rules and artistic practice’

The requirement that protected artworks have ‘serious artistic value’ is the very thing contemporary art and postmodernism itself attempt to defy


The Miller Test 1973

Asks three questions to determine whether a given work should be labelled ‘obscene’, and hence denied constitutional protection:

Whether ‘the average person, applying contemporary community standards’ would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest
Whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct
Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value

Obscenity Law

‘To protect art whilst prohibiting trash’
‘The dividing line between speech and non-speech’
‘The dividing line between prison and freedom’

Who decides what is serious art and what isn't ?


These cause a stir because they show semi erotic values
The argument is that your parents have nude photographs of you but this does not justify placing them in exhibitions and blowing them up

- Laws and society has changed in the way we view things.
- In an age where schools won't place photographs of children without consent
- Artists are still aloud to photograph their children nude and place it on websites

‘Upper crust “art lovers” are paying £5 a head to ogle degrading snaps of children plastered across the walls of one of Britain’s most exclusive galleries’

‘A revolting exhibition of perversion under the guise of art’






Tierney Gearon, Guardian, 2001

Richard Prince, spiritual Prince, 1983
- ‘A bath-damp and decidedly underage Brooke Shields … when Prince invites us to ogle Brooke Shields in her prepubescent nakedness, his impulse has less to do with his desire to savour the lubricious titillations that it was shot to spark in its original context … than with a profound fascination for the child star’s story’

If you try and look at this image on the website you get this view





 

Copyright 2010. All rights reserved.

RSS Feed. This blog is proudly powered by Blogger and uses Modern Clix, a theme by Rodrigo Galindez. Modern Clix blogger template by Introblogger.